February 17, 2005

photastic

I would like to essay a roll of film. I would like to develop your photos. Over the next month or two, I'd like to take your photos and write an essay that would fit on the back of the photo. So if you want to be part of the roll, send me one photo, 4"x6". Color or B&W. I prefer not to develop a photo of three people standing side-by-side, in front of a picnic table, smiling. However, I claim to write non-fiction, so I'll deal with what I'm given. So if you a have a photo and want to play, either scan it in and send the file to junkmailforblankets@hotmail.com or mail me a disc with the file on it or mail the actual photo and I'll scan it. What am I forgetting?

p.s. I'm thinking a roll of 24 exposures. There's always that one that's half-black half-photo, so I'm settling on 23.

p.p.s. I'm reserving the right to do a bit of "stylistic" editing where I deem necessary. If you don't like the sound of that plan coming together, let me know and I'll leave yours untouched.

Posted by ghetto monk at February 17, 2005 09:22 AM | TrackBack
Comments

tease.

Posted by: emily at February 17, 2005 09:52 AM

i'm in. i even wrote it on my hand so i'd remember.

Posted by: steph at February 17, 2005 01:17 PM

i would be honored.

Posted by: allyson at February 17, 2005 03:51 PM

* not sure if i get it. so then you're taking 23.5 pictures and then writing about them? we just send one picture....

Posted by: jane. at February 17, 2005 04:57 PM

count me.
count me.

Posted by: joy at February 17, 2005 04:58 PM

yes, jane--i'm accepting 23 pictures from people, and i'm going to write a back-of-the-photo sized essay for each one.

Posted by: jeremy at February 17, 2005 06:28 PM

(what i meant, of course, was "can i please be considered?")

humbly,

Posted by: steph at February 17, 2005 08:01 PM

* thanks for the clarification. it'll be neat to see what is created.

Posted by: jane. at February 17, 2005 09:24 PM

ooh me, ooh me.

Posted by: emily jane at February 17, 2005 10:12 PM

does it have to be a photo of our person, or can it be any sky/face/bad attempts we've taken?

Posted by: dorkwad at February 17, 2005 10:47 PM

steph, you can be as bossy as you want to be, if you wanted to be. but i assumed delight.

beloved dorkwad, it can be a photo of anything you want, but knowing you, it's probably wise of me to reserve editing (read: fuzzing out) rights.

Posted by: jeremy at February 17, 2005 11:10 PM

I second Emily Jane ("ooh me, ooh me")! We all get to see the finished product, I assume?

Posted by: April at February 19, 2005 09:11 AM

You got 23, yet? If not, count me in.

Posted by: Matt Mulder at February 21, 2005 07:47 PM

great, matt. i'm at about 11 now. send away, please.

Posted by: jeremy at February 21, 2005 07:52 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?